Saturday, November 04, 2006

Seinophilia

Jerry Seinfeld is not a genius. Yet people seldom think so, when landing up in 1000s, paying $70 for an hour of his standup routine. It seems outrageous that a man in a suit, telling jokes about public restrooms and mobile phones, is priced at the same value as an entire production, with cast, crew, music, lighting, glitz and grandeur. How does he compare with the Phantom of the Opera? Has he put in as much money into putting up his show? Clearly not. Has he spent months choreographing, coordinating and reharsing? No. He's probably taken a good, hard look at all the animate and inanimate objects around him and identified their most annoying traits, in preparation for the show. And probably read the newspapers.
Whether it is a musical concert, a dance performance, shows on ice, circus acrobats, or even theater, the principal reason why people would go, is to get inspired by the talents or skills possessed and trained for, by other men and women. Stand-up comedy, due to its fragmented and quotidian nature is not inspiring. It has traditionally been a filler in variety entertainment shows, done by funny men outside of their day jobs. It comes nowhere close to an art form, or a honed skill that can wow other human beings. It is decidedly a lesser form of entertainment than theater, and a much less deep than humorous writing.

So how is Seinfeld able to justify the whopping ticket prices to his audiences?

An easy answer is that he is the title star of a stupendously successful television blockbuster. However, one wonders if Jennifer Anniston or Matt Le Blanc, both stars of a similarly successful TV show would have garnered 7000 people at $70 each for an evening. Maybe not. Seinfeld's appeal is not just that he starred in a top TV show. He has, somehow, managed to win America's trust and indulgence, enough to get them to laugh at their raisin bran bowl and their own toddlers. For some reason, it feels like Jerry really understands. Even though he may not have been the principal writer of those shows, he has earned credibility as a cerebral, insightful man. Probably some of this has to do with the fact that he is a standup comedian in the show too. In an expert stroke, he has managed to ensconce himself in the American psyche over the past 10 years, as the guy who has the right to laugh at them. One wonders if his character was intended as a mega brand imaging ploy to guarantee the rest of his standup comedy career, or that events have played out to his advantage.

His jokes, themselves, are wry, observational and have a repeat value due to their universal relatability. Whether it is mobile phones, household garbage, weather reports or his mom's paranoia, everyone in the audience can relate to his topics. There are no cultural or background references, no know-what and know-how of concepts, or anything that can make one feel left out. For instance, if one translated his jokes to a native Indian tongue, they would still be as funny, and one's parents would laugh at them. That means he his humor is beyond language and culture. That also means it is way more native than sophisticated. After his show yesterday i overheard a man on the road tell his wife "Why are you asking me to go to our son's best friend's party? Didnt you hear Seinfeld yesterday? 4 year olds dont have best friends! Put a sock on your hand, call it a puppet and that is their new best friend!".
Perhaps that is why people pay to listen to him. He teaches them when and how to laugh.

5 Comments:

At 7:40 PM, Blogger yangry star said...

No new information in this article, but why does it read so well! You are casting an order to the thoughts that swirl in one's mind (not that I'm comparing my mind to a teacup, think whirlpool!). But isn't that what Seinfeld is trying to do to? Of course, he is potentially wrecking the order of things as we know it too.

Dwelling a little on my first thought, there's nothing new in a sunrise or a walk on the beach either.

PS - Actually most TV comedians have a pretty pricey stand up run. Kevin James from King of Queens, Robin Williams, Chris Rock, etc. come to mind. So the argument extends...

 
At 8:31 PM, Blogger QueenofShobha said...

Robin Williams has the same sort of image- cerebral, sensitive and affectionate in his observations. But Kevin James...really? I am not sure i would pay 70 bucks to see him. When Seinfeld entered on stage, people gave him an ovation for 3-4 minutes until he had to shout "Cut that out, will you?" We are talking serious mass respect here. Dont think Kevin James is a candidate.

 
At 6:30 AM, Blogger S Kris said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At 6:34 AM, Blogger S Kris said...

My take is that you never pay for the content of a show. You pay for the brandname of a show. An easily produced one-man 3-act broadway show costs much more than a much more lavish production in Austin. So, it is not really the amount of effort that has gone into making a show that people pay for. It is really the amount of effort that has gone into building the brand.
In any case, I've been doing the rounds of the standup acts in e-town. Robin williams makes seinfeld look like a campaigning politician. Check it out:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e4BX5-E_DYU
Warning: Not for the fainthearted -sailors blush!

 
At 5:04 PM, Blogger anonymous said...

I have to respectfully disagree..I think making people laugh is an art, and no way inferior to the phantom of the opera. You miss the point that Phantom of the opera will just keep people gaping at them, without ticking their senses, whereas comedy has a job to do: It has to make people laugh.
And trust me thats not easy.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home